MAPPING
THE LABYRINTH
EVALUATION REPORT ON AN ONGOING CONTEMPORARY VISUAL ARTS PROJECT
ENTITLED THE MAZE WHIRLPOOL
BY
Colin McGookin
JANUARY 2000
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
2 METHODOLOGY
3 SELECTED GROUPS
4 OPERATION
5 TIMETABLES
6 WORKSHEETS
7 CONCLUSIONS
8 ANALYSIS
9 RECOMMENDATIONS
1 INTRODUCTION
During the summer of
1992 a large group exhibition was held in various venues all over
Belfast. Entitled `No Access' it was initiated and organised by
the many artists involved to demonstrate the huge amount of new
work being made in Belfast by artists who had no access to the dwindling
official outlets for contemporary art in the city. At the Fashion
Design Centre, then opposite what is now the Ormeau Baths Gallery,
I put on show a new large-scale painting which had developed out
of my banner inspired works of the 1980's. Entitled `Inside the
Kerbstones' it was a 100 feet long ring of double sided banners
sewn together to create an enclosure echoing the Neolithic stone
circles of Newgrange and Knowth in the Boyne valley. Accompanied
by associated but framed satellite paintings the work was successfully
received and featured in the BBC programme 29 Bedford Street. In
1994 at Wilmont House in Belfast the artist led Catalyst Arts organisation
held a group exhibition called `Hit and Run'. I was selected to
participate in the exhibition and decided to launch a new painting,
which had developed from `Inside the Kerbstones'. Entitled `The
Maze Whirlpool' it was conceived from the beginning as being an
interactive painting. My concerns were to recreate the seemingly
chaotic placing and reworking of the Stone Age art and subsequent
graffiti into my own amalgam of visual symbolism and to mirror the
evolutionary process found in much of the folk imagery that I use
as my source material. I wanted to invite people to contribute their
responses to the work they viewed by painting and drawing onto the
material on display.
From this first manifestation
of the `The Maze Whirlpool' the limitations of my initial approach
were evident. The gallery setting was intimidating and the free
hanging work was difficult to work on. Workshop sessions would have
to be designed to enable participants to understand, prepare and
ultimately engage with the painting. Over the next few years I developed
a methodology and process for the workshop sessions and in 1997
I was invited to Los Angeles to work with children in the Santa
Monica area.
2 METHODOLOGY
In developing `The Maze
Whirlpool' I proposed specifically
"To develop a visual
arts activity to enable participants to creatively explore the theme
of symbolism in relation to their immediate experience. To offer
them the opportunity to extend their exploration and understanding
of symbols from the wider community beyond their immediate experience
and cultural setting by working on a global visual arts project"
I proposed achieving
these aims by beginning the project with an introductory session
looking at my previous work and the way it had evolved. I would
then discuss the group and their particular geographical area and
would focus the participants ideas into a series of paintings, drawings
and statements. These would be developed into symbolical maps of
the participants view of their environment and subsequently into
the creation of flags and banners celebrating the identity of each
group. To complete the project I would invite the children to work
on my collaborative 3-Dimensional painting on silk and linen `The
Maze Whirlpool'. With particular reference to its form and central
theme based around ideas on evolution and growth and the traditional
folk art of the guild banner and how our activity can be interpreted
as contemporary visual art.
The first use of this
methodology was in Santa Monica California. `The Maze Whirlpool'
school project was introduced to each participating group and I
presented a slide talk to the children about Ireland, my previous
work and this particular project finishing with a question and answer
session. I spoke about the central theme of the maze and labyrinth
and how it was based around ideas on integration, evolution and
growth. Also how I was synthesising a traditional medium of folk-art,
the guild banner, with contemporary fine art painting. The children
were very enthusiastic. They were interested in Ireland and the
project and were very keen to get involved. The idea of communicating
with Irish children through the project was very exciting for them
especially as a number of them claimed ancestries in Ireland.
Each workshop day my
LA based colleague Clayton Campbell and I went to the school and
together with a teacher we would lead a group of around 20 children
to a designated playground area where the unrolled banner and painting
materials would be ready for a working session. Images the children
found important and text they wished to communicate had been developed
in their classrooms and during the painting sessions these would
then be added to those already on the fabric. At the end of the
sessions we would view their work and discuss the progress. The
90° November sun would dry the paint and the banner would then
be rolled up to return to my studio where I would do further work
on it during the evening.
This process continued
for 4 weeks. At the end of this period a presentation was prepared
and invitations sent out. The banner was draped from some young
trees in the playground and looked absolutely splendid in the Californian
sunshine. The whole school, interested parents and the media turned
up and filed in and out of the labyrinth. I gave short lectures
to each class on what we had achieved and answered their very sophisticated
questions. They presented me with a tape of a peace song they had
written in music class and I finished by thanking them for their
contribution. I videotaped the whole process and sent them a copy
with additional footage of further progress back in Ireland and
with messages from Irish children to them. We have since exchanged
messages and I hope to bring the painting back to them in the near
future so they can see its development for themselves.
On returning to Belfast
I set about organising further sessions. In collaboration with Gavin
O'Connor of Voluntary Services Belfast Wheelworks and Maurna Crozier
of the Community Relations Council we developed a series of sessions
using my existing methodology and introducing the CRC publication
`An Ulster Weans A-Z'. This was to be the most intensive approach
to the project yet. We selected participating groups to represent
a fair cross section of the rural and urban communities of Northern
Ireland and designed the evaluation process to keep a thorough record
of the projects development.
3 THE CRC SESSIONS: SELECTED GROUPS
The 4 contact leaders
and the groups selected to be involved in this part of the project
were:
RURAL URBAN
Ms Geraldine McCormick
Pomeroy After Schools Club
34 Sessiagh Scott
Rock
Dungannon BT70 3JT
Tel. 01868 759255
Mr John Nelson
Dee Street Busters
Dee Street Community Centre
Dee Street
Belfast BT4
Tel. 01232 460107
Mr Paul Murphy
Kids Own After School Club
52-54 Milburn Close
Cookstown BT80 8HF
Tel. 01648 769334
Mr Michael Goodman
Lower Ormeau Residents Action Group
156 Ormeau Road
Belfast
Tel. 01232 584020
4 THE CRC SESSIONS: OPERATION
Upon provision of my
proposed timetable a preliminary meeting was set up with each group.
Finding locations and meeting group leaders did prove a test however
the project and timetable were discussed and any perceived difficulties
ironed out. The Pomeroy group wanted evidence of Police clearance
on myself, which Gavin promptly provided. I had to take into account
the venues and class sizes in order to begin purchasing materials
and prepare for operational difficulties. It is well known how difficult
large-scale arts activities can be in busy and spatially challenged
centres.
All these meetings took
place before Christmas vacation 1997 and everything was in order
for the project to start early in January 1998.
5 THE CRC SESSIONS: TIMETABLES
INITIAL PROPOSED TIMETABLE
Pomeroy
Group 1 Cookstown
Group 2 Dee Street
Group 3 Lower Ormeau
Group 4
Session 1 Thur 15th January
2.45 – 4.45
Introduction to project Thur 15th January
5.00 – 7.00
introduction to project Tue 20th January
3.00 – 5.00
introduction to project Mon 26th January
7.00 – 9.00
introduction to project
Session 2 Thur 22nd January
2.45 – 4.45
Exploring and drawing symbols Thur 22nd January
5.00 – 7.00
exploring and drawing symbols Tue 27th January
3.00 – 5.00
exploring and drawing symbols Mon 2nd February
7.00 – 9.00
exploring and drawing symbols
Session 3 Thur 29th January
2.45 – 4.45
Introduction to paint Thur 29th January
5.00 – 7.00
introduction to paint Tue 3rd February
3.00 – 5.00
introduction to paint Mon 9th February
7.00 – 9.00
introduction to paint
Session 4
Thur 5th February
2.45 – 4.45
Collage Thur 5th February
5.00 – 7.00
Collage Tue 10th February
3.00 – 5.00
Collage Mon 16 th February
7.00 – 9.00
Collage
Session 5 Thur 12th February
2.45 – 4.45
Introduction to cloth Thur 12th February
5.00 – 7.00
Introducing cloth Tue 17th February
3.00 – 5.00
Introduction to cloth Mon 23rd February
7.00 – 9.00
Introduction to cloth
Session 6 Thur 19th February
2.45 – 4.45
Developing our map Thur 19th February
5.00 – 7.00
Developing map Tue 24th February
3.00 – 5.00
Developing our map Mon 2nd March
7.00 – 9.00
Developing our map
Session 7 Thur 26th February
2.45 – 4.45
Developing Pomeroy Thur 26th February
5.00 – 7.00
Development Tue 3rd March
3.00 – 5.00
Developing Dee Street Mon 9th March
7.00 – 9.00
Developing Ormeau
Session 8 Wed 4th March
2.45 – 4.45
Introducing map to Maze Wed 4th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Map to Maze Tue 10th March
3.00 – 5.00
Introducing map to Maze Mon 16th March
7.00 – 9.00
Introducing map to Maze
Session 9 Wed 11th March
2.45 – 4.45
Develop Maze #1 Wed 11th March
5.00 – 7.00
Develop Maze #1 Tue 17th March
3.00 – 5.00
Develop Maze #1 Mon 23rd March
7.00 – 9.00
Develop Maze #1
Session 10 Wed 18th March
2.45 – 4.45
Develop Maze #2 Wed 18th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Develop Maze #2 Tue 24th March
3.00 – 5.00
Develop Maze #2 Mon 30th March
7.00 – 9.00
Develop Maze #2
Session 11 Wed 25th March
2.45 – 4.45
Presentation preview Wed 25th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
preview Tue 31st March
3.00 – 5.00
Presentation preview Mon 6th April
7.00 – 9.00
Presentation preview
Session 12 Wed 1st April
2.45 – 4.45
Presentation Wed 1st April
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00 Tue 7th April
3.00 – 5.00
Presentation
Mon 13th April
7.00 – 9.00
Presentation
ACTUAL TIMETABLE POMEROY AFTER SCHOOL GROUP
Session
Number Date time and topic of session Brief report on session Number
of participants
1
Thursday 15th January
2.45 – 4.45
Introduction to project Very pleasant group. All immediately warmed
to the project and the proposed tasks ahead. Good amount of verbal
feedback from children and parent volunteer. Time flying in.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
2
Thursday 22nd January
2.45 – 4.45
Exploring and drawing symbols Good practical session. Took some
video and photos. Evaluation sheets proving too difficult with time
constraints. Video is one way to overcome this. Worked on paper.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
3
Thursday 29th January
2.45 – 4.45
Introduction to paint Good session again. This group is a real hoot.
I am finding sessions very enjoyable. Only worry is political climate
and the rush between here and Cookstown. Started working on cloth.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
4
Thursday 5th February
2.45 – 4.45
Collage Continued the paintings from last week to get some finished
works. Took video and photos. Good session again. Worked to finish
small cloth flags. Raised timetable amendment issue.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
5
Thursday 12th February
2.45 – 4.45
Introduction to cloth Introduced large piece of cloth for all to
work on together. Good session of drawing. Great crack from the
kids especially Cormac (burning frogs!). No problem with timetable
changes.
6
(3 f & 3 m)
6
Thursday 19th February
2.45 – 4.45
Developing our map Introduced good permanent acrylic paint to begin
painting the large banner. Rigged up line to dry banner on. Excellent
results.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
7
Thursday 26th February
2.45 – 4.45
Developing Pomeroy Continued on large banner. Kids very excitable.
Has Spring come early? All got into it but felt a wee bit more like
a chore. Want to finish this though so give it next week then onto
silk.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
8
Wed 4th March
2.45 – 4.45
Introducing map to Maze Final session on large banner map. Good
work done but more flagging of enthusiasm. Painting looks good and
nice video & photos. Bright evenings are here.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
9
Wed 11th March
2.45 – 4.45
Develop Maze #1 We worked on side 2 of banner and it looks good.
We think we have now completed this piece and are ready for the
silk.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
10
Wed 18th March
2.45 – 4.45
Develop Maze #2 Good session on silk. Left a space for Cait, who
is absent, to fill next week.
6
(2 f & 4 m)
11
Wed 25th March
2.45 – 4.45
Presentation preview Full team and great session. On target for
presentation next week.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
12
Wed 1st April
2.45 – 4.45
Presentation Lovely final session. Rolled out complete banner and
added some written comments. Looked at the photos and we bade farewell.
They gave me a card and an Easter egg. Great.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
ACTUAL TIMETABLE COOKSTOWN KIDS OWN
Session
Number Date time and topic of session Brief report on session Number
of participants
1
Thur 15th January
5.00 – 7.00
introduction to project Lucky synchronicity. I asked person on busy
street way to Kids Own and they worked there! Good introduction
and nice session. Time will be a concern.
5
(5f.)
2
Thur 22nd January
5.00 – 7.00
exploring and drawing symbols Group work well. They have a good
handle on project and are enthusiastic.
6
(5f & 1m)
3
Thur 29th January
5.00 – 7.00
introduction to paint Good session. They are all very competent
with painting and drawing.
7
(5f & 2m)
4
Thur 5th February
5.00 – 7.00
Collage A few newcomers. One is very young. Raised issue with Paul
about amending timetable. He seemed a bit worried about it.
9
(7f & 2m)
5
Thur 12th February
5.00 – 7.00
Introduction to cloth More newcomers! They are enthusiastic so no
big worry. Started drawing first big piece. Discussed timetable
and found solution to worries raised.
14
(12f & 2m)
6
Thur 19th February
5.00 – 7.00
Developing map Yet more newcomers! There is a great buzz in the
group. Parents enthusiastic and encouraging. Began painting with
good permanent acrylics.
17
(12f & 5m)
7
Thur 26th February
5.00 – 7.00
Development Piece looked good and we continued on it. Seems trouble
with hanging up piece as another leader in centre is not on-board.
Today we left it on floor until dry.
17
(12f & 5m)
8
Wed 4th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
map to Maze Strange with a change to routine. But very successful.
Two smaller groups able to work on banner map with ease and good
results.
Total
17
(12f & 5m)
9
Wed 11th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Develop Maze #1 Another two good sessions. We worked on side 2 of
large banner and both groups put a lot into it. Looks very good.
Good video and photos.
Total
17
(12f & 5m)
10
Wed 18th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Develop Maze #2 2 great sessions with younger group. Next week the
older kids can work on the other side.
Total
8
(5f & 3m)
11
Wed 25th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Presentation Excellent work from both groups. Gave another silk
to them, as they are so good. It is invaluable having Arlene here
as she is an excellent art tutor.
Total
8
(5f & 3m)
12
Wed 1st April
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Presentation Lovely final session. They were able to watch the video
and I gave them their photos. I discussed inviting them to a future
presentation and they presented me with a card and a book.
Total
17
(12f & 5m)
ACTUAL TIMETABLE DEE STREET BUSTERS
Session
Number Date time and topic of session Brief report on session Number
of participants
1
Tue 20th January
3.00 – 5.00
introduction to project Group has short attention span and a few
seem not too impressed by proposed project. A disruptive child needed
removing at end of session.
11
(6 f & 5 m)
2
Tue 27th January
3.00 – 5.00
exploring and drawing symbols Good session. Some very focused children
are getting into the work and producing nice pictures. Evaluation
problem same as other groups. Video and photos real necessity.
12
(7 f & 5 m)
3
Tue 3rd February
3.00 – 5.00
introduction to paint Decided to introduce cloth to get some results
and keep their interest. Some excellent flags created. I want to
use permanent materials soon as not sure how long they will stick
at it.
8
(5 f & 3 m)
4
Tue 10th February
3.00 – 5.00
Collage Quiet session! All but one kid away on a trip. Took the
opportunity to do slide projection from earlier photos of the group
to start large cloth banner.
1
(1m)
5
Tue 17th February
3.00 – 5.00
Introduction to cloth Children very impressed by last weeks drawing
and really got stuck in. Introduced them to good acrylic paints
and they did some nice painting.
6
(4 f & 2 m)
6
Tue 24th February
3.00 – 5.00
Developing our map Return of some children from first couple of
sessions and they did some good work.
6
(3 f & 3 m)
7
Tue 3rd March
3.00 – 5.00
Developing Dee Street Most of last weeks' children on trip so another
bunch from earlier weeks. Did new drawings from photos I had taken.
Good results.
6
(2f & 4m)
8
Tue 10th March
3.00 – 5.00
Introducing map to Maze Excellent session with fluorescent overalls.
Great fun and good painting of last weeks drawings.
8
(4f & 4m)
9
Tue 17th March
3.00 – 5.00
Develop Maze #1 I turned up but Centre closed.
10
Tue 24th March
3.00 – 5.00
Develop Maze #2 Bit of a slow session, they were keener to do new
pictures than try and finish last banner. What we did do was good,
airport and motorbike especially but slow session.
9
(3f & 6m)
11
Tue 31st March
3.00 – 5.00
Presentation preview Good session. Rolled out entire piece and added
more visuals and text.
9
(3f & 6m)
12
Tue 7th April
3.00 – 5.00
Presentation
Final session. Presented video and photos of sessions and unfurled
the work to date.
9
(3f & 6m)
ACTUAL TIMETABLE LOWER ORMEAU RESIDENTS
Session
Number Date time and topic of session Brief report on session Number
of participants
1
Mon 26th January
7.00 – 9.00
introduction to project Busy session with lots of interesting drawings.
A bit of an atmosphere regarding political tension.
6
(4f & 2m)
2
Mon 2nd February
7.00 – 9.00
exploring and drawing symbols Group a bit scattered and easily distracted.
When focused good work results. Showed them projection techniques
and requested photo negatives to work from.
8
(5f & 3m)
3
Mon 9th February
7.00 – 9.00
introduction to paint Started large banner.
6
(4f & 2m)
4
Mon 16 th February
7.00 – 9.00
Collage Started second large banner. Good crack from group who still
seem a bit too distracted.
8
(5f & 3m)
5
Mon 23rd February
7.00 – 9.00
Introduction to cloth Group very scattered again. Worked on second
side of large banner and got photos & video of painting and
general carry-on.
6
(4f & 2m)
6
Mon 2nd March
7.00 – 9.00
Developing our map Had to start new large piece as Janine not on
tonight. Good results and painted a bit as well as drawing new composition.
Lot of fooling about again but generally productive session.
6
(2f & 4m)
7
Mon 9th March
7.00 – 9.00
Developing Ormeau Excellent session until the last 15 minutes when
they all went crazy. A couple of guys who were not really contributing
started wrecking. I think the work is salvageable. No photos or
video!
10
(8m & 2f)
8
Mon 16th March
7.00 – 9.00
Introducing map to Maze Session cancelled, as they were busy preparing
for St Patricks Day.
9
Mon 23rd March
7.00 – 9.00
Develop Maze #1 Bomb found outside centre just before I arrived.
When disabled by Army found to be hoax. Session could not happen
due to time involved.
10
Mon 30th March
7.00 – 9.00
Develop Maze #2 Strange session as I was on my own for most of the
night. Gerry came in at end and asked when will I be back. He then
sent a few of the guys up to help me clear up.
4
(4m)
11
Mon 27th April
7.00 – 9.00
Presentation Excellent writing and video session. Good video interviews
with the girls.
8
(4m & 4f))
12
Mon 18th May
7.00 – 9.00
Presentation US artist Francisco Letelier came and excellent discussion
session. Showed video and photos to date and unrolled a section
of the painting. Alistair Maclennon performance on Bridge.
8
(4m & 4f))
6 THE CRC SESSIONS: WORKSHEETS
Preliminary group meetings
GROUP
1
Thursday 11th Dec 97
2.45 – 3.45
Introduction to project and artist Attendance
8
GROUP
2
Thursday 11th Dec 97
4.00 – 5.00
Introduction to project and artist Attendance
1
GROUP
3
Tue 16th Dec 97
3.00 – 4.00
Introduction to project and artist Attendance
2
GROUP
4
Mon 15th Dec 97
7.00 – 8.00
Introduction to project and artist Attendance
2
Further Comments
Had difficulty making
contact with Pomeroy and Cookstown group leaders. In the former
case the address I went to was Geraldine McCormacks home and not
the centre. In the latter case it was for the centre and Paul Murphy
was at home with his sick daughter. I had no problems with John
Nelson of Dee Street who was very positive and supportive. I had
a number of problems with LORAG. Group leader Michael Goodman was
not available for a couple of dates I proposed. However I eventually
met with Jannine, Fionnula Walsh and Gerry Rice.
All the Venues have specific
problems with storage of painted works. These are not insurmountable
and I propose to erect a clothesline to hang work on until dry.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 1
GROUP
1
Thursday 15th January
2.45 – 4.45
Introduction to project Very pleasant group. All immediately warmed
to the project and the proposed tasks ahead. Good amount of verbal
feedback from children and parent volunteer. Time flying in.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Thur 15th January
5.00 – 7.00
introduction to project Lucky synchronicity. I asked person on busy
street way to Kids Own and the person worked there! Good introduction
and a nice session. Timekeeping will be a concern.
5
(5f.)
GROUP
3
Tue 20th January
3.00 – 5.00
introduction to project Group has short attention span and a few
seem not too impressed by proposed project. A disruptive child needed
removing at end of session.
11
(6 f & 5 m)
GROUP
4
Mon 26th January
7.00 – 9.00
introduction to project Busy session with lots of interesting drawings.
A bit of an atmosphere regarding political tension.
6
(4f & 2m)
Further Comments
It is a bit strange with
each set of sessions taking two weeks to complete. The first group
have moved on and started something new which might raise a continuity
issue later into the programme. I will review this as things develop.
The age diversity is also a concern. They range from 6 to 16 and
have a wide range of technical awareness, which so far is complimentary.
I will need to check that this does not impede younger participants.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 2
GROUP
1
Thursday 22nd January
2.45 – 4.45
Exploring and drawing symbols Good practical session. Took some
video and photos. Evaluation sheets proving too difficult with time
constraints. Video is one way to overcome this. Worked on paper.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Thur 22nd January
5.00 – 7.00
exploring and drawing symbols Group work well. They have a good
handle on project and are enthusiastic.
6
(5f & 1m)
GROUP
3
Tue 27th January
3.00 – 5.00
exploring and drawing symbols Good session. Some very focused children
are getting into the work and producing nice pictures. Evaluation
problem same as other groups. Video and photos real necessity.
12
(7 f & 5 m)
GROUP
4
Mon 2nd February
7.00 – 9.00
exploring and drawing symbols Group a bit scattered and easily distracted.
When focused good work results. Showed them projection techniques
and requested photo negatives to work from.
8
(5f & 3m)
Further Comments
Everything is going excellently
so far. I am assessing further the capabilities of each centre to
get a measure of what is possible with regard to scale of work attempted
and possibilities for leaving work in situ for drying out. No major
problems and certain flexibility seems to be possible.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 3
GROUP
1
Thursday 29th January
2.45 – 4.45
Introduction to paint Good session again. This group is a real hoot.
I am finding sessions very enjoyable. Only worry is political climate.
Also the rush between here and Cookstown. Started working on cloth.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Thur 29th January
5.00 – 7.00
introduction to paint Good session. They are all very competent
with painting and drawing.
7
(5f & 2m)
GROUP
3
Tue 3rd February
3.00 – 5.00
introduction to paint Decided to introduce cloth to get some results
and keep their interest. Some excellent flags created. I want to
use permanent materials soon as not sure how long they will stick
at it.
8
(5 f & 3 m)
GROUP
4
Mon 9th February
7.00 – 9.00
introduction to paint Started a large-scale banner. All pretty excited.
6
(4f & 2m)
Further Comment
The political situation
is grim and causes me some concern. I feel exposed. I must look
strange to anyone watching me as I go from one area into another.
I have spoken to Gavin and we agree that if things get too nerve
wracking then I will cancel a session. I will keep situation under
constant review. Listening to the news a lot.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 4
GROUP
1
Thursday 5th February
2.45 – 4.45
Collage Continued the paintings from last week to get some finished
works. Took video and photos. Good session again. Worked to finish
small cloth flags. Raised timetable amendment issue.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Thur 5th February
5.00 – 7.00
Collage A few newcomers. One is very young. Raised issue with Paul
about amending timetable. He seemed a bit worried about it.
9
(7f & 2m)
GROUP
3
Tue 10th February
3.00 – 5.00
Collage Quiet session! All but one kid away on a trip. Took the
opportunity to do slide projection from earlier photos of the group
to start large cloth banner.
1
(1m)
GROUP
4
Mon 16 th February
7.00 – 9.00
Collage Started second large banner. Good crack from group who still
seem a bit too distracted.
8
(5f & 3m)
Further Comment
As the multi media arts
training course is now happening on a Thursday I will have to change
the day for mid Ulster visit. The Cookstown group would loose some
children so they are reluctant to agree. Compromise has been reached
by my offering to come to them earlier and giving two shorter sessions
thus seeing all children.
All the groups have expressed
a great sense of interest and loyalty to the project. Although the
Belfast groups have a lot of distractions for me to compete with
(each has another artist complete with their project plus computer
games) there is a core group in each centre who return again and
again.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 5
GROUP
1
Thursday 12th February
2.45 – 4.45
Introduction to cloth Introduced large piece of cloth for all to
work on together. Good session of drawing. Great crack from the
kids especially Cormac (burning frogs!). No problem with timetable
changes.
6
(3 f & 3 m)
GROUP
2
Thur 12th February
5.00 – 7.00
Introduction to cloth More newcomers! They are enthusiastic so no
big worry. Started drawing first big piece. Discussed timetable
and found solution to worries raised.
14
(12f & 2m)
GROUP
3
Tue 17th February
3.00 – 5.00
Introduction to cloth Children very impressed by last weeks drawing
and really got stuck in. Introduced them to good acrylic paints
and they did some nice painting.
6
(4 f & 2 m)
GROUP
4
Mon 23rd February
7.00 – 9.00
Introduction to cloth Group very scattered again. Worked on second
side of large banner and got photos & video of painting and
general carry-on.
6
(4f & 2m)
Further Comment
I think the idea about
working on the big Maze will not work as in U.S. The time for drying
will not let me take it from one group to another especially in
mid Ulster were I am essentially taking 3 sessions one after another.
It is possible that I can add the pieces the children are working
on to the larger piece. Also that I have a session in a centre and
leave the maze there until the next week. As I am reluctant to risk
letting the main piece get damaged or lost whilst it is out of my
control I think the former idea is best. It is a pity as part of
the process of my project is interaction with the commentary inscribed
in America. Maybe a session just looking and drawing with markers
would be a possibility.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 6
GROUP
1
Thursday 19th February
2.45 – 4.45
Developing our map Introduced good permanent acrylic paint to begin
painting the large banner. Rigged up line to dry banner on. Excellent
results.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Thur 19th February
5.00 – 7.00
Developing map Yet more newcomers! There is a great buzz in the
group. Parents enthusiastic and encouraging. Began painting with
good permanent acrylics.
17
(12f & 5m)
GROUP
3
Tue 24th February
3.00 – 5.00
Developing our map Return of some children from first couple of
sessions and they did some good work.
6
(3 f & 3 m)
GROUP
4
Mon 2nd March
7.00 – 9.00
Developing our map Had to start new large piece as Janine not on
tonight. Good results and painted a bit as well as drawing new composition.
Lot of fooling about again but generally productive session.
6
(2f & 4m)
Further Comment
Half way through project
and time is really flying. I feel a lot more relaxed now about travelling
about the city and country. Coping with all the different age groups
is proving no problem.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 7
GROUP
1
Thursday 26th February
2.45 – 4.45
Developing Pomeroy Continued on large banner. Kids very excitable.
Has Spring come early? All got into it but felt a wee bit more like
a chore. Want to finish this though so give it next week then onto
silk.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Thur 26th February
5.00 – 7.00
Development Piece looked good and we continued on it. Seems trouble
with hanging up piece as another leader in centre is not on-board.
Today we left it on floor until dry.
17
(12f & 5m)
GROUP
3
Tue 3rd March
3.00 – 5.00
Developing Dee Street Most of last weeks' children on trip so another
bunch from earlier weeks. Did new drawings from photos I had taken.
Good results.
6
(2f & 4m)
GROUP
4
Mon 9th March
7.00 – 9.00
Developing Ormeau Excellent session until the last 15 minutes when
they all went crazy. A couple of guys who were not really contributing
started wrecking. I think the work is salvageable. No photos or
video!
10
(8m & 2f)
Further Comment
It is great to see lighter
evenings as it makes driving easier and adds a bit of colour to
things. Some of the LORAG kids are pretty wild but not a big problem.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 8
GROUP
1
Wed 4th March
2.45 – 4.45
Introducing map to Maze Final session on large banner map. Good
work done but more flagging of enthusiasm. Painting looks good and
nice video & photos. Bright evenings are definitely here. Cormacs
loosing it.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Wed 4th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
map to Maze Strange with a change to routine but very successful.
Two smaller groups able to work on banner map with ease and good
results.
Total
17
(12f & 5m)
GROUP
3
Tue 10th March
3.00 – 5.00
Introducing map to Maze Excellent session with fluorescent overalls.
Great fun and good painting of last weeks drawings.
8
(4f & 4m)
GROUP
4
Mon 16th March
7.00 – 9.00
Introducing map to Maze Session cancelled as they were preparing
for St Patricks' day tomorrow.
Further Comment
I am still happy with
progress and think we are on target to have a good standard of work
completed by end of project. The original idea of exploring symbols
has taken us on to a stage were we have created a symbolical picture
of each area and its particular character. This process could go
on and really develop into something.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 9
GROUP
1
Wed 11th March
2.45 – 4.45
Develop Maze #1 We worked on side 2 of banner and it looks good.
We think we have now completed this piece and are ready for the
silk.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Wed 11th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Develop Maze #1 Another two good sessions. We worked on side 2 of
large banner and both groups put a lot into it. Looks very good.
Good video and photos.
Total
17
(12f & 5m)
GROUP
3
Tue 17th March
3.00 – 5.00
Develop Maze #1 I turned up but Centre closed
GROUP
4
Mon 23rd March
7.00 – 9.00
Develop Maze #1 Bomb found outside centre just before I arrived.
When disabled by Army found to be hoax. Session could not happen
due to time involved.
Further Comment
I am having a few too
many problems in the urban situation and it is bewildering. I cannot
reschedule a session when it is cancelled at this stage as my preparation
and travel is completed and also it would throw the timetable way
out of synchronisation. I will make up the time by staying longer
in the later sessions and putting time into making the documentary
video for them all.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 10
GROUP
1
Wed 18th March
2.45 – 4.45
Develop Maze #2 Good session on silk. Left a space for Cait, who
is absent, to work on next week.
6
(2 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Wed 18th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Develop Maze #2 2 great sessions with younger group. Next week the
older kids can work on the other side.
Total
8
(5f & 3m)
GROUP
3
Tue 24th March
3.00 – 5.00
Develop Maze #2 Bit of a slow session, they were keener to do new
pictures than try and finish last banner. What we did do was good,
airport and motorbike especially but slow session.
9
(3f & 6m)
GROUP
4
Mon 30th March
7.00 – 9.00
Develop Maze #2 Strange session as I was on my own for most of the
night. Gerry came in at end and asked when will I be back. He then
sent a few of the guys up to help me clear up.
4
(4m)
Further Comment
LORAG is really a bit difficult at times. The continuity has got
lost so they do not expect me even though this date was on the initial
timetable. I really enjoy the rural sessions and am now starting
to dismay for the urban situation.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 11
GROUP
1
Wed 25th March
2.45 – 4.45
Presentation preview Full team and great session. On target for
presentation next week.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Wed 25th March
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Presentation Excellent work from both groups. Gave another silk
to them, as they are so good. It is invaluable having Arlene here
as she is an excellent art tutor.
Total
8
(5f & 3m)
GROUP
3
Tue 31st March
3.00 – 5.00
Presentation preview Good session. Rolled out entire piece and added
more visuals and text.
9
(3f & 6m)
GROUP
4
Mon 27th April
7.00 – 9.00
Presentation Excellent writing and video session. Good interview
with the girls.
8
(4m & 4f))
Further Comment
Am very happy with the
work to date and think they will have fun seeing the fruits of their
input next week. Just goes to show. The LORAG session was excellent
and so too Dee Street. These City kids are so unpredictable.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WEEKLY WORKSHEET
Week 12
GROUP
1
Wed 1st April
2.45 – 4.45
Presentation Lovely final session. Rolled out complete banner and
added some written comments. Looked at the photos and we bade farewell.
They gave me a card and an Easter egg. Great.
7
(3 f & 4 m)
GROUP
2
Wed 1st April
1.30 – 2.30
5.00 - 6.00
Presentation Lovely final session. They were able to watch the video
and I gave them their photos. I discussed inviting them to a future
presentation and they presented me with a card and a book.
Total
17
(12f & 5m)
GROUP
3
Tue 7th April
3.00 – 5.00
Presentation
Final session. Presented video and photos of sessions and unfurled
the work to date.
9
(3f & 6m)
GROUP
4
Mon 18th May
7.00 – 9.00
Presentation US artist Francisco attended for an excellent discussion
session. Showed video and photos to date and unrolled a section
of the painting. Alistair Maclennon performance on Bridge.
8
(4m & 4f))
Further Comment
These were very sad sessions everywhere. I will miss all the children.
Their input has been inspiring and gives me hope for the future.
All of them are very aware and rise to a creative challenge. I am
looking forward to meeting up with them all again when a decent
venue is organised for `The Maze Whirlpool'.
7 THE CRC SESSIONS: ANALYSIS
My role in this visual
arts project was to attend the 4 centres listed above and facilitate
the delivery of the arts project. My general task was "To develop
a visual arts activity to support and explore the Community Relations
Council publication `An Ulster Weans A-Z'". More specifically
my task was "To develop a visual arts activity to enable children
to creatively explore the theme of symbolism in relation to their
immediate experience and to offer them the opportunity to extend
their exploration and understanding of symbols from the wider community
beyond their immediate experience and cultural setting". My
methodology laid out the process I proposed to follow and the worksheets
and commentary listed the progress of this task. The successful
execution of this role can be demonstrated from the worksheets and
is corroborated by the video and photographic documentation.
The management of this
project was by Gavin O'Connor. His task was to brief me on the detail
of the course and provide backup and support with regard to any
operational difficulties.
The length of the course
was 12 weeks in each centre. Due to staggered start times and unforeseen
timetable changes the complete course spanned the period of 15 January
1988 to 18 May 1998. If we take into account the initial meetings
with the groups the start date was actually 15 December 1997. The
format for each session was a 2-hour working period. Operationally
this worked out differently for each centre. On the rural day I
travelled from 12 noon and carried out my sessions, arriving home
at 8pm. On the urban days I could leave 15 minutes before a session
and be home 15 minutes after it finished if all went according to
plan. Finally I was allocated 5 hours to collate evaluation material
and 7.5 hours to write this report. I now estimate it has taken
just over 16 hours actually writing and amending this document.
Some things were more difficult than anticipated. For instance it
took me 2 hours to scan in the images found on these pages alone.
Also collating and copying the videotape took two 6-hour sessions.
I believe these difficulties were partly due to the fact it is the
first time I have used some of the new scanning and editing technology
required.
The content of the course
was laid out in the initial timetable. This was adhered to with
just a few minor adjustments due to technical reasons. For instance
when `The Maze Whirlpool' labyrinth was finally introduced it was
impossible to paint on a section and then move the complete item
to another venue. Drying times would have meant storing it overnight
in the centre, which would have necessitated a return journey to
pick it up. I got around this difficulty by deciding to take separate
sections to each centre. After painting they would let the silk
dry, usually after hanging it on a clothesline, and then store it
for the following week. After a few weeks like this I sewed the
sections onto the main labyrinth and during the last few sessions
the complete labyrinth was unrolled. Each centre was then able to
see the other centres work and could respond in some way.
It can be demonstrated
that course aims and objectives were successfully achieved.
The parents and leaders
and the children themselves referred to learning gained by the children.
They spoke of this being a unique experience for them. They were
proud of the growing cohesion of their groups and their interaction
with the other children involved. They were also convinced it enhanced
their status and made other parents want to have their children
involved with the group. Paul Murphy in Cookstown felt that the
feedback from parents was so good it resulted in his enrolment rise
from 5 in week one to 17 by week six. They all stated they did not
engage in enough visual arts activities at school or in the after
school setting. They all loved looking at what the other groups
had done each week and this added to the transfer of skills. For
instance an impromptu slide projection session in Lower Ormeau quickly
became the topic of conversation in the other centres until it was
demonstrated there too.
THE CRC SESSIONS: CONCLUSIONS
I believe this project
was a great success. Although I abandoned the initial evaluation
process due to the operational difficulties of time constraints,
age differences and some illiteracy the video documentation process
adopted in its place has provided excellent evidence. It has demonstrated
that the participants, their group leaders and even many parents
enjoyed the working sessions and the outcomes. The video sequences
of work in progress and of a sessions ending show real pride, understanding
and joy in achievement.
There were few negative
aspects and I must say I found the course to be a very positive
experience. However of all my observations the most striking thing
was the dichotomy between the rural and urban environments. I immediately
noticed several things. One of the firsts was more manic and hyper
behaviour in the urban kids and a general cynicism for authority
either from the group leaders or myself. There was a sense they
were pushing to determine your limits a lot of the time, which was
fine as long as you let them know where to stop. If you were tired
and let them continue with this the situation could quickly become
irretrievable. I also found the older children becoming separated
along gender lines with a bit of friction developing between the
males and females which could cause some sexist bawdiness, which
I had to not infrequently check. I remarked in my notes about the
sheer amount of choice that the urban children had. I found this
allowed the children to dip in and out of participating in our project
and must say it caused me a bit of dismay with the urban groups.
They would put in a lot of concentration for short bursts, show
a lot of promise, then go away to play with computer games.
One other difference
I found between rural and urban was evidence of the politicisation
of the latter. Whilst exploring the symbolism of an area might be
expected to bring this out it is still noteworthy that the rural
children chose to define their areas by symbols of rural life such
as town buildings, places, animals and vehicles. Saying that a few
helicopters did appear and also some religious buildings both interior
and exterior. One girl also represented herself in Irish dancing
costume. However on the whole they were very gentle depictions of
a rural idyll with hardly any of the aggressive notes found in the
city. One boy in Pomeroy painted an explosion in the middle of a
depiction of their main street, which was quite disturbing. He spoke
of this as an image from an action video he had seen. Another boy
painted a field on fire. He explained that his father burned the
grass every spring prior to planting a crop. He also told us that
burning frogs would come leaping out of the field, a story we did
not believe until his mother confirmed it later. The children in
Cookstown also painted very sublime images of shops and houses surrounded
by trees and lots of suns and colour. This group was the largest
of all and they worked hard and joyfully through the painting sessions
often singing songs. I believe this atmosphere was assisted by the
presence of very talented playworkers one in particular, Arlene,
staying throughout each session assisting and encouraging the children.
In Pomeroy too a different parent sat through each session every
week helping and encouraging the children. At the end of both rural
sessions the parents would arrive, surge into our room and take
great interest in what we had created. This was not the case in
the urban setting. Helpers did come in and look at what we were
doing and often offered advice and assistance for short periods.
However I did not meet any parents at all in the city with the exception
of two who also worked in the Dee Street centre. The urban groups
were quite different in other ways. Visually the cityscape predominated
with its industry and airports, also its territories, flags and
graffiti. These children and especially Lower Ormeau were very aware
of the particular issues facing their communities. The Dee Street
children fixed on flags during an early session and some, without
any prompting from me, decided to put them into a cross community
context and crossed tricolour and union flag. This caused some concern
to some more vocal children and a lively debate followed during
which I explained to them the content of the various flags they
were painting. When they realised they were inaccurate with the
finer detail of layout they got bored with traditional flags and
began designing symbolical representation of their ideal flags.
These included Teletubbies with football club shirts and images
of their centre. Children from LORAG represented their ideas emphatically
in word and image. I must say that I was quite aware of the particular
difficulties this area faced but I was still shocked and very moved
by testimony from the children. The people from this area have suffered
very real loss and pain from past and continuing sectarian violence
and I must say I felt a chilling and particular vulnerability on
my visits to their centre. The children were very aware of things
happening on the main road just outside their front door and it
used to make me jumpy the way they spotted potential threats and
immediately leapt to the windows to check things out. When I brought
an American colleague who was on a residency in Belfast they spoke
of their hopes of peace and fears of further conflict. They took
us up to the Ormeau Bridge where another artist colleague had performed
an installation and tied up lists of the names of all victims of
the conflict. They pointed out so many relatives and friends amongst
the dead the scale of it appalled us. One of the images that remain
strongest with me from this group is that of the children on the
bridge pointing out these names. Another is, ironically, the manic
session when they wanted to write `mentions', their word for their
signatures or nicknames, all over the banner. They did very text
based sessions generally but this particular session was wild. Other
images they focused on where of their district and the bridge and
the activities in their centre of which they were very proud. The
leaders here have their hands filled dealing with these children.
They are very strong-willed but can really work when motivated.
The girls especially are excellent speakers and could articulate
well their hopes and fears, likes and dislikes.
8 THE CRC SESSIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS
It has become apparent
to me that the out of school setting is a particularly difficult
place for long term activity of a `serious' nature. The competition
between their other activities and your Project really demands it
be injected with a level of fun and have exciting, measurable and
enjoyable outcomes. Visual arts activities demonstrably have the
potential for fulfilling these requirements. Group activities producing
collaborative artworks as well as individual responses to set themes
can all provide fulfilling results.
I felt that an edge to
this particular project was that the children were getting the chance
to contribute to a work that was also a `serious' painting and which
would eventually be shown in a `real' gallery. When concentration
or discipline began to deteriorate a reminder of the impetus behind
the work at hand inevitably brought renewed effort. In the urban
groups I felt that a number of distractions intervened. These groups
had so many other projects for the children to dip into, and over
the period involved so many incidents of civil unrest occurred locally,
that this long term course of study proved too much of a commitment
for many of them to adhere to. My feeling was that the urban children
did not have the same sense of novelty and innocence that was evidently
displayed in the rural setting. For sure certain documentary evidence
backs this up. Saying that the short bursts of intense, almost manic,
levels of activity that happened in the urban groups provided their
own dividends. Certainly their input into their artwork and `The
Maze Whirlpool' provides an exciting and ultimately rewarding experience.
I think it should be
seen as an ideal to recommend that future work in this area be complimented
by projects within the school setting to provide some high watermark
for the level of achievement possible. However I know that the out
of school setting is an important area to provide education for
children who have moved outside the current education system either
temporarily or permanently. I also personally feel that by inputting
enough of your own work and yourself into a project its importance
will rub off onto the children and provide them with evidence of
the standard of achievement you have set yourself. If these standards
are sufficiently high you will be rewarded by the outcomes.
I would like to recommend
that any future Project in the out of school setting has a component
that enables the children to achieve an outcome that rewards their
input. Let them work with the knowledge that they have participated
in a real arts event. Something important and with a shelf life
beyond their activity in this particular time and place. We must
let them be creative and know that they have contributed to something
that will help this world see and know itself and truly become a
better place. To contribute to a real exhibit in a real venue with
real documentation in the form of professional publication, videotape
or CD-ROM is a reward the children can be offered and we can ultimately
deliver. The technology is within reach and the funding should be
achievable.
9 THE FUTURE OF `THE
MAZE WHIRLPOOL'
I would like to widen
the range of participants to this project both geographically and
by age and ability. Particular regions that would be of interest
to me are the Republic of Ireland, Europe, the Middle East, Australia
and the Far East. I would also like to see participants with disabilities
and from different age groups contribute to the imagery. I want
to continue to work towards developing and documenting this project.
I will continue to contribute and fundraise to this end until `The
Maze Whirlpool' has exhausted all possibilities that I can visualise
for it. At that time I want to see the project donated to an appropriate
public collection. I also want the real artwork to be exhibited
and experienced by as wide a public as can be reached.
Colin McGookin January 2000
|